NSW Caselaw
Industrial Court of New South Wales
CITATION: De Haas v Chloer Pty Ltd, in liq. (formerly Business Catalyst International Pty Ltd) and Another [2008] NSWIRComm 227
APPLICANT: Eric De Haas
PARTIES: FIRST RESPONDENT: Chloer Pty Ltd, in liq. (formerly Business Catalyst International Pty Ltd)
SECOND RESPONDENT: Zia Qureshi
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 5872 of 2003
CORAM: Backman J
CATCHWORDS: Unfair contracts - s 106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 - applicant employed as executive manager by first respondent - applicant later purchased units in the BCI Employee Participation Trust (the Scheme) to value of $25,000 - Scheme in turn purchased shares in first respondent which were held in trust for applicant - applicant's salary reduced by 30 per cent for period of three months due to impact of economic downturn on first respondent - termination of employment - whether Scheme a related condition or collateral arrangement to contract of employment - whether contract of employment was unfair - allegation of poor work performance considered - allegation of breach of duty of confidence considered - whether reasonable notice on termination - whether Scheme unfair in its terms - whether Scheme became unfair at termination - whether alleged representations made Scheme unfair - whether unfairness in salary reduction - relief - whether second respondent liable to pay monetary orders - orders
Corporations Act 2001(Cth) LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Arbitration Act 1940 Industrial Relations Act 1996
Ace Business Brokers Pty Ltd v Phillips-Treby (2000) 100 IR 420 Barataud v Chipperfield (No 3) [2006] NSWIRComm 249 Beahan v Bush Boake Allen Australia Limited (1999) 47 NSWLR 648; (1999) 93 IR 1 Brown and Others v Rezitis and Others (1970) 127 CLR 157 Cadwallader v Bajco Pty Ltd & Ors [2002] NSWCA 328 CASES CITED: Custom Credit Corporation Ltd v Goldsmith [1976] AR (NSW) 98 GIO Australia Limited and Another v O'Donnell (1996) 70 IR 1 Grygiel v Baine & Ors [2005] NSWCA 218 Jones v Dunkel and Another (1959) 101 CLR 298 Silbermann v One.Tel Limited (In liquidation) and anor [2005] NSWIRComm 477 Wheatley v Armstrong [1995] NSWIRComm 235 Wirraway (NSW) Pty Ltd v Ultra Tune Australia Pty Ltd (2006) 156 IR 367
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate