NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Commonwealth of Australia v Randwick City Council [2000] NSWLEC 171 APPLICANT: Commonwealth of Australia PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Randwick City Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10072 of 2000; 10073 of 2000 CORAM: Talbot J KEY ISSUES: Evidence :- Practice & Procedure - subpoena - application to set aside - amounts to discovery - oppressive - abuse of process LEGISLATION CITED: Arhill Pty Ltd and Ors v General Terminal Co Pty Ltd and Ors (1990) 23 NSWLR 545; Botany Bay Instrumentation & Control Pty Ltd and Anor v Stewart and Anor [1984] 3 NSWLR 98; Deposit & Investment Co Ltd (Receivers Appointed) and Ors v Peat Marwick Mitchell & Co (1996) 39 NSWLR 267; CASES CITED: Lucas Industries Ltd v Hewitt and Ors (1978) 18 ALR 555; Re Westinghouse Electric Corporation Uranium Contract [1978] AC 547; Spencer Motors Pty Ltd v LNC Industries Ltd [1982] 2 NSWLR 921; Southern Pacific Hotel Services Inc v Southern Pacific Hotel Corporation Ltd [1984] 1 NSWLR 710; The Commissioner of Railways v Small (1938) 38 SR(NSW) 564 DATES OF HEARING: 21/07/2000 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/07/2000
APPLICANT: Mr M Wright (Barrister) SOLICITORS: Minter Ellison LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Mr W R Davison SC SOLICITORS: Bowen & Gerathy
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate