NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: Mullins and New South Wales Department of Education and Training [2009] NSWIRComm 23
APPLICANT (on costs) New South Wales Department of Education and Training PARTIES: RESPONDENT (on costs) Keith Mullins
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 1471 of 2008
CORAM: Sams DP
Costs - victimisation application - application out of time - Commission refused to exercise discretion to accept out of time application - costs reserved - further submissions - whether application frivolous and/or vexatious or brought without reasonable cause - costs sought for Counsel's fees only. CATCHWORDS: Held; applicant given three opportunities to address claim against him - failure to address costs application - appeal against substantive decision - request to adjourn costs application refused - meaning of frivolous, vexatious and instituted without reasonable cause - claim meets tests of being vexatious and brought without reasonable cause - costs orders made.
LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996
Attorney General v Wentworth (1988) 14 NSWLR 481 Burton v Shire of Bairnsdale (1908) 7 CLR 76 CASES CITED: Elka Simjanovska and Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales (No 6) [2008] NSWIRComm 163 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125 Keith Mullins v New South Wales Department of Education and Training [2008] NSWIRComm 236
HEARING DATES: Written submissions: 30 October 2008; 30 December 2008
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate