NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: Rogers Kumar v Sherrick Pty Ltd t.as Cronulla Nursing Home [2006] NSWIRComm 1073
APPLICANT Rogers Kumar PARTIES: RESPONDENT Sherrick Pty Ltd t/a Cronulla Nursing Home
FILE NUMBER(S): 2238 of 2005
CORAM: Macdonald C
CATCHWORDS: Unfair dismissal application - directions for filing of evidence - no evidence filed - dismissal for want of prosecution
LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996
HEARING DATES: 14/02/06
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/05/2006
APPLICANT No Appearance LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr M Diamond
DECISION: INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES
CORAM: Macdonald
5 May 2006
Matter No IRC 2238 of 2005
ROGERS KUMAR v SHERRICK PTY LTD t/a CRONULLA NURSING HOME
Application by Rogers Kumar re unfair dismissal pursuant to section 84 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996
JUDGMENT
[2006] NSWIRComm 1073
1 This is an application by Rogers Kumar ("the Applicant") for unfair dismissal against Sherrick Pty Ltd t/a Cronulla Nursing Home ("the Respondent") pursuant to section 84 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 ("the Act"). 2 The matter was wet down for Conciliation and Directions on 24 May 2005, before Commissioner O'Neill. The Applicant was represented by a solicitor. 3 The matter had further listings before O'Neill C on 21 June, 21 July, 24 August, 7 and 22 September 2005.
On the latter date, a program for the filing of witness statements was put in place. A Hearing date of 14 February 2006 was set. 4 A "Notice of Ceasing to Act", was filed by the Applicant's solicitor on 10 November 2005. 5 Commissioner O'Neill received correspondence from the Respondent's representative, dated 14 December 2005. The Respondent's representative being McCarthy Ausgroup Pty Ltd.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate