NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Wilson v Bourke Shire Council & Anor [2000] NSWLEC 271 APPLICANT Wilson PARTIES : RESPONDENT Bourke Shire Council & Anor FILE NUMBER(S) : 10312 of 2000 CORAM: Cowdroy J KEY ISSUES: Practice & Procedure :- application to raise complex issues following allocation of hearing dates - inability of respondents to obtain evidence in answer to proposed amendments - amendment to claims allowed - adjournment granted on terms as to costs. LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 CASES CITED: State of Queensland and Anor v JR Holdings Pty Limited (1996-1997) 189 CLR 146 DATES OF HEARING: 22/9/00, 25/9/00 EX TEMPORE 09/25/2000 JUDGMENT DATE :
APPLICANT Mr P Larkin (Barrister)
SOLICITORS Environmental Defender's Office Ltd
FIRST RESPONDENT Mr J Whitehouse (Solicitor)
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: SOLICITORS Minter Ellison
SECOND & THIRD RESPONDENT Mr P McEwen SC
SOLICITORS Bruce & Stewart Commercial Practice
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND MATTER No. 10312 of 2000 ENVIRONMENT COURT CORAM: Cowdroy J OF NEW SOUTH WALES DECISION DATE: 25/9/00
Bruce Wilson on behalf of the Gurrungar Environment Group Applicant v Bourke Shire Council First Respondent Hoynes, Wheeler & Thorne Pty Limited Second Respondent Clyde Agriculture Limited Third Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate