NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Melville v Craig Nowlan & Associates & Anor [2001] NSWLEC 109 APPLICANT Melville PARTIES : RESPONDENT Craig Nowlan & Associates & Anor FILE NUMBER(S) : 40011 of 2001 CORAM: Cowdroy J KEY ISSUES: Costs :- notice of motion for security for costs - public interest litigation - impecunious applicant - whether applicant should be ordered to provide security - purpose of security to ensure compensation for costs if respondent successful - order for security made LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 123 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 69 Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223; DJL v Central Authority (2000) 201 CLR 226; Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72 ; CASES CITED: Razorback Environment Protection Society Inc v Wollondilly Council & Anor [1999] NSWLEC 8; Ryde Pool Action Group Inc v Ryde City Council [1999] NSWLEC 96; Save the Showground for Sydney Inc v Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning (Pearlman J, NSWLEC, 26 November 1998, unreported); Timbarra Protection Coalition Inc v Ross Mining NL & Ors (Talbot J, NSWLEC, 5 May 1998, unreported) ; Town Watch Incorporated v Grafton City Council (1997) 93 LGERA 401 DATES OF HEARING: 30/5/01 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/18/2001
APPLICANT Mr J Johnson (Barrister)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate