NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales CITATION: Bombala Investment Pty Ltd V Great Lakes Council [1999] NSWLEC 75
PARTIES Applicant Bombala Investment Pty Ltd
Respondent Great Lakes Council
NUMBER: 30127 of 1998
CORAM: Sheahan J
KEY ISSUES: :- Compulsory acquisition of an easement - disturbance - highest and best use
LEGISLATION CITED: Compulsory acquisition of an easement - disturbance - highest and best use
DATES OF HEARING: 03/01/1999
DATE OF JUDGMENT DELIVERY: 03/31/1999
Applicant Mr A J J Thompson (Barrister) Mr Digby Dunn (Solicitor) of Stacks Forster LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Respondent Mr P Tomasetti (Barrister) Mr P Rees (Solicitor)
JUDGMENT: IN THE LAND AND Matter No: 30127 of 1998 ENVIRONMENT COURT Coram: Sheahan J OF NEW SOUTH WALES 31 March 1999
BOMBALA INVESTMENT PTY LIMITED Applicant v GREAT LAKES COUNCIL Respondent
JUDGMENT
Introduction
1. This is an objection under s 66 of the Land Acquisition (Just Terms) Compensation Act 1991 ("the Just Terms Act") to the amount of compensation offered to the applicant ("Bombala") by the respondent ("Council") for the compulsory acquisition of an easement for drainage over lot 35 ("lot 35"), Deposited Plan 850018, shown in Deposited Plan 268004, registered with the Registrar-General's office on 4 September 1997.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate