NSW Caselaw
Industrial Court of New South Wales
CITATION: Veney v New South Wales Local Government, Clerical, Administrative, Energy, Airlines and Utilities Union (No 2) [2009] NSWIRComm 33
ALLAN JOHN VENEY Applicant PARTIES: NEW SOUTH WALES LOCAL GOVERNMENT, CLERICAL, ADMINISTRATIVE, ENERGY, AIRLINES AND UTILITIES UNION Respondent
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 1774 of 2007
CORAM: Schmidt J
CATCHWORDS: Costs - costs of motion - whether there should be apportionment - whether costs should be costs in cause - whether costs should be payable forthwith - applicant to pay respondent's costs of the motion as agreed or assessed forthwith
Alamdo Holdings Pty Limited v Australian Window Furnishings (NSW) Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 7 Fiduciary v Morningstar [2002] NSWSC 432 CASES CITED: Mok v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (No 2) 47 FCR 81 Surfing Hardware International Holdings v MacAusland (No 6) (2007) 169 IR 282 Veney v New South Wales Local Government, Clerical, Administrative, Energy, Airlines and Utilities Union [2008] NSWIRComm 228
HEARING DATES: 13 March 2009 EXTEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 13 March 2009
APPLICANT: Mr G Boyce of counsel
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Ms KT Nomchong of counsel SOLICITORS: White Barnes
JUDGMENT:
- 13 - INDUSTRIAL COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
CORAM: Schmidt J
13 March 2009
Matter No IRC 1774 of 2007
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate