NSW Caselaw
Industrial Court of New South Wales
CITATION: Ian King v Regulatory Concepts Pty Limited & Anor [2006] NSWIRComm 385
APPLICANT: Ian King
PARTIES: FIRST RESPONDENT: Regulatory Concepts Pty Limited
SECOND RESPONDENT: Helena Wanda Dickenson
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 5181 of 2003
CORAM: Schmidt J
CATCHWORDS: Quantification of money orders - parties' competing calculations - applicant's calculations reflect claim and judgment - orders made - costs - respondents to pay applicant's costs as agreed or assessed other than respondents' costs thrown away as a result of adjournment of the hearing - applicant to bear those costs, as agreed or assessed
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/12/2006
APPLICANT: Mr D Shoebridge of counsel SOLICITORS: LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Employment Lawyers
RESPONDENTS: Ms Dickenson, Second Respondent
JUDGMENT:
- 4 - INDUSTRIAL COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
CORAM: Schmidt J
12 December 2006
Matter No IRC 5181 of 2003
IAN KING v REGULATORY CONCEPTS PTY LIMITED AND OTHERS Application under s.106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 JUDGMENT
[2006] NSWIRComm 385
1 Judgment was given in this matter on 27 September 2006 (see Ian King v Regulatory Concepts Pty Limited & Anor [2006] NSWIRComm 310). The orders made were:
1. The variation of the contract from 10 March 2003, to require Mr King to be paid for the work performed on the PharmaDirectory project at the agreed rate of $45 per hour, upon provision of the timesheets recording the work so performed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate