NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Thomson J & (3) Ors v Leichhardt Municipal Council & (3) Ors [2000] NSWLEC 230 FIRST APPLICANT: James Evan Thomson SECOND APPLICANT: John Knowles THIRD APPLICANTS: Sarah Fisher and Charles Fisher FOURTH APPLICANTS: Danny Sampson and Monika Hauber PARTIES : FIRST RESPONDENT: Leichhardt Municipal Council SECOND RESPONDENT: Salvatore Panucci THIRD RESPONDENT: Roger Nader FOURTH RESPONDENT: Giorgio Lamo FILE NUMBER(S) : 40056 of 1998 CORAM: Lloyd J KEY ISSUES: Judicial Review :- administrative law - whether consideration of subdivision requires consideration of future development permissible without consent - errors of fact which contribute to a wrong decision - procedural fairness Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 97 LEGISLATION CITED: Local Government Act 1919 Pt XII Leichhardt Local Environmental Plan No. 20 cl 19 Coal & Allied Operations Pty Limited v Australian Industrial Relations Commission (2000) 74 ALJR 1348; Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Limited (1986) 162 CLR 24; CASES CITED: Parramatta City Council v Hale (1982) 47 LGRA 319; Somerville v Dalby (1990) 69 LGRA 422; Weal v Bathurst City Council [2000] NSWCA 88 DATES OF HEARING: 16/10/2000, 17/10/2000 and 18/10/2000 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/14/2001
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate