NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 114 LGERA 35
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Wilson on behalf of Gurrungar Environment Group v Bourke Shire Council and Ors [2001] NSWLEC 28 APPLICANT Wilson on behalf of Gurrungar Environment Group PARTIES : RESPONDENTS Bourke Shire Council and Ors FILE NUMBER(S) : 10312 of 2000 CORAM: Pearlman J KEY ISSUES: Development Consent :- designated development - objector appeal - scope of appeal - s 90(1) considerations - relevance LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 4(1), s 87(1), s 90(1), s 98(1) Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 1994 sch 3 CASES CITED: Penrith City Council v Waste Management Authority and Anor (1990) 71 LGRA 376; Shoalhaven City Council v Lovell (1996) 136 FLR 58 DATES OF HEARING: 08/02/2001 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/04/2001
APPLICANT Mr P W Larkin (Barrister) SOLICITORS Environmental Defender's Office Ltd
FIRST RESPONDENT Mr J F Whitehouse (Solicitor) LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: SOLICITORS Minter Ellison
SECOND AND THIRD RESPONDENTS Mr P J McEwen SC SOLICITORS Bruce & Stewart
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND 10312 of 2000 ENVIRONMENT COURT Pearlman J OF NEW SOUTH WALES 4 May 2001
BRUCE WILSON ON BEHALF OF GURRUNGAR ENVIRONMENT GROUP Applicant v BOURKE SHIRE COUNCIL First Respondent HOYNES WHEELER & THORNE PTY LTD Second Respondent CLYDE AGRICULTURE LTD Third Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate