NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: Sydney Ferries Corporation v The Seamen's Union of Australia, NSW Branch on behalf of Levy [2009] NSWIRComm 126
PARTIES: Sydney Ferries Corporation (Appellant/Cross Respondent) The Seamen's Union of Australia, New South Wales Branch on behalf of Graham Levy (Respondent/Cross Appellant)
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 238 and 252 of 2009
CORAM: Boland J President; Walton J Vice-President; Sams DP
APPEAL - Cross-appeal - Unfair dismissal - Maritime industry - Employee summarily dismissed for serious and wilful misconduct - Allegation that dismissed employee abused and spat on fellow employee and for implementing an unlawful union direction whilst a union delegate - Dismissal found to be harsh at first instance - Reinstatement ordered - Whether conduct in implementing union direction warranted dismissal - Whether dismissal was harsh - Whether reinstatement was appropriate remedy - Whether dismissed employee entitled to lost remuneration - Leave to appeal granted - Leave to appeal in cross-appeal refused - Appeal and cross-appeal dismissed. CATCHWORDS: UNFAIR DISMISSAL - Appeal - Cross-appeal - Maritime industry - Employee summarily dismissed for serious and wilful misconduct - Allegation that dismissed employee abused and spat on fellow employee and for implementing an unlawful union direction whilst a union delegate - Dismissal found to be harsh at first instance - Reinstatement ordered - Whether conduct in implementing union direction warranted dismissal - Whether dismissal was harsh - Whether reinstatement was appropriate remedy - Whether dismissed employee entitled to lost remuneration - Leave to appeal granted - Leave to appeal in cross-appeal refused - Appeal and cross-appeal dismissed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate