NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales CITATION: Environment Protection Authority -V- Adi Ltd [1999] NSWLEC 14 This judgment revised on: 09/03/99 PARTIES PROSECUTOR: Environment Protection Authority
DEFENDANTS: Adi Ltd
NUMBER: 50075 of 1998
CORAM: Talbot J
KEY ISSUES: :- Crimes - Pollution; Prosecution, plea of guilty, admission of tendency evidence in relation to penalty assessment
LEGISLATION CITED: Clean Waters Act
DATES OF HEARING: 02/01/1999; 02/02/1999
DATE OF JUDGMENT DELIVERY: 02/10/1999
PROSECUTOR: Mr D A Buchanan SC With Mr C J Leggat Bar Instructed by Environment Protection Authority LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
DEFENDANTS: Mr P R Rigg Solicitor Of Deacons Graham & James
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND MATTER No. 50075 of 1998 ENVIRONMENT COURT CORAM: Talbot J OF NEW SOUTH WALES DECISION DATE: 10 February 1999 ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AUTHORITY Prosecutor v
ADI LTD Defendant REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
1. On 6 November 1998 I found that the defendant company committed the offence charged that on 23 April 1997 it polluted the waters of the Murray River by introducing solid wastes and ethanol contrary to s 16(1) of the Clean Waters Act.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate