NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 113 LGERA 463
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Environment Protection Authority v The Shell Company of Australia Limited [2001] NSWLEC 66 PROSECUTOR: Environment Protection Authority PARTIES : DEFENDANT: The Shell Company of Australia Limited FILE NUMBER(S) : 50071 of 1997 CORAM: Bignold J KEY ISSUES: Costs :- successful Defendant in criminal proceedings - entitlement to costs - whether all or part only. LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 52 Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534; CASES CITED: McDonagh v Birdon Dredging Pty Ltd (1998) 99 LGERA 198 at 206; Owen v Willtara Construction Pty Ltd (unreported 11 December 1998) DATES OF HEARING: 3 April 2001 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/12/2001
PROSECUTOR: Mr D Buchanan SC, with Mr D Jordan, Barrister SOLICITORS Solicitor Environement Protection Authority LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: DEFENDANT: Mr G Miller QC with Mr I Hemmings, Barrister SOLICITORS Coudert Brothers
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND Matter No. 50071 of 1997 ENVIRONMENT COURT OF Coram: Bignold J. NEW SOUTH WALES 12 April 2001
ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AUTHORITY
Prosecutor
v
THE SHELL COMPANY OF AUSTRALIA LIMITED
Defendant
JUDGMENT
Bignold J:
A. INTRODUCTION
1. The Defendant in a successfully defended prosecution charging it with an offence against the Environmental Offences and Penalties Act 1989, s 6(1) seeks by Notice of Motion filed 22 February 2001, an order that the Prosecutor pay the Defendant's costs in the proceedings.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate