NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Todbern Pty Limited v Hurstville City Council and Anor. [2001] NSWLEC 145 APPLICANT: Todbern Pty Limited PARTIES : RESPONDENTS: Hurstville City Council and Anor. FILE NUMBER(S) : 20071 of 1999 CORAM: Bignold J KEY ISSUES: Section 56A Appeal :- Meaning of provisions of BCA requirements for disabled access to building. Whether Court had jurisdiction to entertain in an appeal under s 176 an objection pursuant to s 82 LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 56A, s 39(2) Local Government Act 1993, s 82, s 89, s 101, s 176 CASES CITED: Leichhardt Municipal Council v Seatainer Terminals Pty Ltd (1981) 48 LGRA 409; Cacalot Pty Ltd v Sydney City Council (1996) 90 LGERA 424 DATES OF HEARING: 18/12/00, 09/03/01 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/06/2001
APPLICANT: Mr P Clay, Barrister SOLICITORS Verekers
FIRST RESPONDENT: Mr P Rigg, Solicitor LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: SOLICITORS Deacons Graham and James
SECOND RESPONDENT: Mr A M Pickles, Barrister SOLICITORS Abbott Tout
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND Matter No. 20071 of 1999 ENVIRONMENT COURT OF Coram: Bignold J. NEW SOUTH WALES 6 July 2001
TODBERN PTY LIMITED
Applicant
v
HURSTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
First Respondent
KOGARAH MUNICIPAL COUNCIL
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate