NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: Thomson and anor v Societe Generale Australia Limited and anor [2006] NSWIRComm 24
FIRST APPLICANT Michael Thomson
SECOND APPLICANT Bengoal Pty Ltd PARTIES: FIRST RESPONDENT Societe Generale Australia Limited
SECOND RESPONDENT Societe Generale
FILE NUMBER(S): 1795 of 2002
CORAM: Marks J
s 106 - unfair contract - whether termination of employment unfair - whether terms of remuneration and entitlements unfair - code of conduct - several incidents in breach of code - warnings - ongoing dispute regarding applicant's bonus entitlements at time of termination - whether applicant terminated because of breach of code of conduct or entitlements dispute - determinative process of relevant unfairness.
CATCHWORDS: Remuneration Entitlements: Terms of employment contract - special conditions clauses regarding bonus entitlements - applicant introduced significant clients to respondents - bonus entitlements dependant on completed transactions with introduced clients - wording of special conditions clauses - differing intentions of the parties regarding application of special conditions clauses - meaning of "net revenue" - "credit charge" or "return on equity" - claims for lost income and opportunity - consideration of Sydney Water v Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales.
HELD: Special conditions clauses did not reflect understanding of parties reached during negotiations - contract unfair by reason of respondents' conduct in applying special conditions - proceedings stood over to allow parties to consider reasons for judgment with liberty to apply - costs reserved.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate