NSW Caselaw
Industrial Court of New South Wales
CITATION: SAS Trustee Corporation v Hazlewood (No 2) [2010] NSWIRComm 8
PARTIES: SAS Trustee Corporation (Appellant) Henry Hazlewood (Respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 2293 of 2008
CORAM: Boland J President; Walton J Vice-President; Staff J
COSTS - appeal - appellant successful on appeal - importance of questions determined in appeal to future administration of Police Superannuation Scheme - appeal brought to clarify proper construction of a section of Police Regulation (Superannuation) Act - balancing of public interest - each party to bear their costs on appeal and at first instance CATCHWORDS: APPEAL - costs - appellant successful on appeal - importance of questions determined in appeal to future administration of Police Superannuation Scheme - appeal brought to clarify proper construction of a section of Police Regulation (Superannuation) Act - balancing of public interest - each party to bear their costs on appeal and at first instance
Industrial Relations Act 1996 Police Regulation (Superannuation) Act 1906 LEGISLATION CITED: Suitors' Fund Act 1951 Superannuation Administration Act 1996 Workers' Compensation Act 1987
CASES CITED: SAS Trustee Corporation v Henry Hazelwood [2009] NSWIRComm 157
HEARING DATES: Written submissions: 6 October 2009, 4 December 2009, 8 December 2009
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 4 February 2010
Mr T Ower of counsel (Appellant) SAS Trustee Corporation LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Mr B Gross SC (Respondent) Walter Madden Jenkins Solicitors
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate