NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2002) 122 LGERA 98
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Porfiri v Ku-ring-gai Council [2002] NSWLEC 136 APPLICANT Porfiri F.C. PARTIES : RESPONDENT Ku-ring-gai Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 0051 of 2002; 0052 of 2002; 0053 of 2002; 0054 of 2002 CORAM: Cowdroy J KEY ISSUES: Question of Law :- relationship between State Environmental Planning Policy and Local Environmental Plan Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance 1971 LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 4, s 36 State Environmental Planning Policy No. 1 State Environmental Planning Policy No. 53 Healesville Holdings Pty Ltd v Pittwater Council (1997) 97 LGERA 95; Hooker Corporation Pty Ltd v Hornsby Shire Council NSWLEC, (unreported, NSWLEC, 2 June 1986); CASES CITED: Hunt v Blacktown City Council (2001) 116 LGERA 356 (CA); Roberts and Ors v Ballina Shire Council and Anor [2001] NSWLEC 242; Springer v Woollahra Municipal Council & Ors [2000] NSWLEC 135 DATES OF HEARING: 29/7/2002 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/22/2002
APPLICANT Mr D Baird (Solicitor)
SOLICITORS Maddocks LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr A Hudson (Solicitor)
SOLICITORS Wilshire Webb
JUDGMENT: 7 IN THE LAND AND MATTER No. 0051-54 of 2002 ENVIRONMENT COURT CORAM: Cowdroy J OF NEW SOUTH WALES DECISION DATE: 22/08/02
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate