NSW Caselaw
Local Court of New South Wales
CITATION: DPP -v- Tulk [2010] NSWLC 28
JURISDICTION: Criminal
PARTIES: Director of Public Prosecutions David Tulk
FILE NUMBER: 2010/240642
PLACE OF HEARING: Albury Local Court
DATE OF DECISION: 12/14/2010
MAGISTRATE: Magistrate Lerve
CATCHWORDS: sentence – sexual intercourse with person between 14 and 16 – meeting complainant in internet chat room – need for general deterrence – types of sexual activity – full time custody appropriate
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1900, s 66C(3)Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, ss 3A, 5, 44
Attorney General's Reference Pursuant to s. 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No. 1 of 2002 (Guideline Judgment on Form 1) [2002] NSWCCA 518 Attorney General's Reference Pursuant to s. 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No. 2 of 2002 (Guideline Judgment on Assault Police) [2002] NSWCCA 515C -P v R [2009] NSWCCA 291 CTM v The Queen [2008] HCA 25Han v R [2009] NSWCCA 300Ibbs v The Queen (1987) 163 CLR 447Kenny v R [2010] NSWCCA 6 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 CASES CITED: R v Borkowski [2009] NSWCCA 102 R v Cahyadi [2007] NSWCCA 1 R v Doan (2000) 50 NSWLR 115 R v PGM [2008] NSWCCA 172 R v Ryan (2003) 141 A Crim R 403 R v Thomson; R v Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 R v Zamagias [2002] NSWCCA 17
TEXTS CITED:
REPRESENTATION: Ms. K. Holloway for the Director of Public Prosecutions Mr. M. Cronin, Solicitor, Messrs. Pogson Cronin, Solicitors for and with Mr Tulk
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate