NSW Caselaw
Industrial Court of New South Wales
CITATION: Singh v The State of New South Wales (Department of Corrective Services and Anor [2008] NSWIRComm 206
APPLICANT (RESPONDENT ON THE MOTION) Gurbax Singh
PARTIES: FIRST RESPONDENT The State of New South Wales (Department of Corrective Services)
SECOND RESPONDENT (APPLICANT ON THE MOTION) Keith Smith
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 1411 of 2007
CORAM: Staff J
CATCHWORDS: Unfair contract - Interlocutory proceedings - Notice of motion seeking that proceedings be dismissed against second respondent - Application for adjournment of hearing of notice of motion refused - Notice of motion not opposed by applicant - Indemnity costs
LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996 Industrial Relations Commission Rules 1996
HEARING DATES: 28 October 2008
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 28 October 2008
APPLICANT (RESPONDENT ON THE MOTION) Mr A Norrie of counsel
FIRST RESPONDENT Solicitor: Ms G Singer LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Department of Corrective Services
SECOND RESPONDENT (APPLICANT ON THE MOTION) Mr A Hatcher of counsel Solicitor: Mr N Keats WG McNally Jones Staff
JUDGMENT:
- 1 - INDUSTRIAL COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
CORAM: STAFF J
Tuesday, 28 October 2008
Matter No IRC 1411 of 2007
GURBAX SINGH v THE STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES (DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIVE SERVICES) AND ANOR
Application under s 106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate