NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Lederer & Ors v Sydney City Council [2002] NSWLEC 156 APPLICANTS: Andrew Lederer, Gizela Fiala & Hexiva Pty Ltd (ACN 001 485 356) PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Sydney City Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10885 of 2001 CORAM: Lloyd J KEY ISSUES: Development Consent :- modification application - substantially different development - heritage building Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 79C, s 96(2)(a), s 96(3) and s 96(6) LEGISLATION CITED: Central Sydney Local Environmental Plan 1996 cl 23(2) Central Sydney Heritage Local Environmental Plan 2000 State Environmental Planning Policy No. 64 - Advertising and Signage cl 11 and cl 22 Coalcliff Community Association Inc v Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning and Others (1999) 106 LGERA 243; Lederer & Ors v Sydney City Council (2002) 119 LGERA 350, [2001] NSWLEC 272; Moto Projects (No. 2) Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council (1999) 106 LGERA 298, [1999] NSWLEC 280; CASES CITED: North Sydney Council v Michael Standley & Associates Pty Ltd (1998) 43 NSWLR 468, 97 LGERA 433; The Satellite Group (Ultimo) Pty Ltd v Sydney City Council [1998] NSWLEC 244; Vacik Pty Ltd v Penrith City Council, NSWLEC, Stein J, 24 February 1992, NSWLEC, unreported; Zhang v Canterbury City Council (2001) 51 NSWLR 589 DATES OF HEARING: 05/08/2002 and 06/08/2002 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/27/2002
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate