NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : GHD Pty Ltd v Pristine Waters Council [2001] NSWLEC 230
APPLICANT PARTIES : GHD Pty Ltd
RESPONDENT Pristine Waters Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10109 of 2001 CORAM: McEwen AJ KEY ISSUES: Costs :- in class 1 - exceptional circumstances - factors relevant to exercise of discretion LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 94 Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 69 Anibal 21 Pty Ltd v Waverley Council (1998) 98 LGERA 296; Berk v Woollahra Municipal Council [No 2] (1993) 78 LGERA 180; Foboco Pty Limited v Kiama Municipal Council (2000) 109 LGERA 160; Macdonald v Mosman Municipal Council (No 2) (2000) 107 LGERA 211; CASES CITED: Maurici v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2001] NSWCA 78; Minas v Botany Municipal Council (1988) 65 LGRA 129; Quota Corporation v Leichhardt Municipal Council (1981) 45 LGRA 319; Raiti v Leichhardt Municipal Council (1991) 72 LGRA 333; Ray Group Pty Ltd v Byron Shire Council (1998) 98 LGERA 378 DATES OF HEARING: 23/08/2001 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 08/23/2001
APPLICANT Mr D Wilson (Barrister)
SOLICITORS Stacks - The Law Firm LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr J Whitehouse (Solicitor)
SOLICITORS Minter Ellison
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate