NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Environment Protection Authority v Baiada Poultry Pty Ltd [2000] NSWLEC 249 PROSECUTOR: Environment Protection Authority PARTIES : DEFENDANT: Baiada Poultry Pty Ltd FILE NUMBER(S) : 50003 of 2000 CORAM: Talbot J KEY ISSUES: Prosecution :- allowance for early plea of guilty and co-operation of defendant prior to laying of the charge - mitigating factors including misunderstanding of strict legal position Clean Air Act 1961 s 10 LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Offences and Penalties Act 1989 Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 s 341 CASES CITED: R v Thompson; R v Houlton [2000] NSWCCA 309 DATES OF HEARING: 16/10/2000 EX TEMPORE 10/16/2000 JUDGMENT DATE :
PROSECUTOR: Mr M M Kelly (Solicitor)
SOLICITORS: Environment Protection Authority LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: DEFENDANT: Mr B J Preston SC
SOLICITORS: Mallesons Stephen Jaques
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND Matter No. 50003 of 2000 ENVIRONMENT COURT Coram: Talbot J OF NEW SOUTH WALES Decision Date: 16 October, 2000
Environment Protection Authority Prosecutor v Baiada Poultry Pty Ltd Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
1. The defendant appears to answer the charge that from 15 February 1999 until 5 March 1999 at Tamworth it committed an offence against the Environmental Offences and Penalties Act 1989 in that it was the occupier of scheduled premises and was not the holder of a licence issued in respect of those premises contrary to s 10 of the Clean Air Act 1961 ("the Clean Air Act").
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate