NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 109 LGERA 321
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Rogan v Pittwater Council [2000] NSWLEC 178 APPLICANT: Rogan PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Pittwater Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10268 of 2000 CORAM: Bignold J KEY ISSUES: Question of Law :- Preliminary Determination - (1) Is development prohibited by LEP? (2) Does LEP impose a development standard in respect of the minimum lot size in a subdivision of Non-Urban land? LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 97 State Environmental Planning Policy No 1 - Development Standards CASES CITED: DATES OF HEARING: 23 June 2000 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/14/2000
APPLICANT: Mr B Hones, Solicitor SOLICITORS Hones Lawyers
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Mr A Galasso, Barrister SOLICITORS Mallesons Stephen Jaques
JUDGMENT: IN THE LAND AND Matter No . 10268 of 2000 ENVIRONMENT COURT OF Coram : Bignold J. NEW SOUTH WALES 14 August 2000
M AND F ROGAN
Applicant
v
PITTWATER COUNCIL
Respondent
JUDGMENT
Bignold J:
A. INTRODUCTION
1. This is an appeal pursuant to the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (the EP&A Act) s 97 against the determination by the Council refusing consent to the Applicant's development application, supported by an objection under State Environmental Planning Policy No 1 - Development Standards (SEPP No 1), to subdivide into two lots an existing lot known as lot 81 Deposited Plan 875079, being No 2A Minkara Road, Bayview (the appeal site).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate