NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 115 LGERA 259
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Ervin Mahrer and Partners v Strathfield Municipal Council [No 2] [2001] NSWLEC 140 APPLICANT: Ervin Mahrer and Partners PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Strathfield Municipal Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10088 of 2000 CORAM: Bignold J KEY ISSUES: :- Whether Applicant on a development appeal should be granted leave to rely upon amended plans Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000, cl 55 Land and Environment Court Rules 1996, pt 13 r 16(b1) Addicoat v Fox (No 2) (1978) 37 LGRA 411; Bankstown Municipal Council v Estates Property Investment Co Pty Ltd (1970) 21 LGRA 433; Basement Pty Ltd v Baulkham Hills Shire Council (2001) NSWLEC 95; Carr v Minister for Land and Water Conservation (2000) 109 LGERA 175; City of Marion v Becker (1973) 6 SASR13; Gibson v Mosman Municipal Council (2001) NSWLEC 134; Hancock Development Corporation Pty Ltd v City of Tea Tree Gully (1986) 42 SASR 584; Independent Holdings Ltd v Adelaide City Planning Commission (1994) 63 SASR 318; Khouri v Burwood Council (2001) NSWLEC 124; McDougall v Warringah Shire Council (1993) 80 LGERA 151; Mison v Randwick City Council (1991) 23 NSWLR 734; Moore v Randwick Municipal Council (1980) 46 LGRA 244; Nalor Pty Ltd v Bankstown City Council (1980) 2 NSWLR 630; CASES CITED: North Sydney Council v Michael Standley and Associates Pty Ltd (1998) 97 LGERA 433; Parkes Developments Pty Ltd v Cambridge Credit Corp Ltd (1974) 33 LGRA 196; Parramatta City Council v Nadroj Pty Ltd (1968) 17 LGRA 81; R v Shanahan & Ors Ex Parte Northern Territory Planning Authority (1984) 54 LGRA 255; Rancast Pty Ltd v Leichhardt Council (1995) 89LGERA 139; Randwick Municipal Council v Janlz Constructions Pty Ltd (1976) 35 LGRA 70; Ross Karp Pty Ltd v Randwick City Council (1999) 106LGERA 397; Ross v Town and Country Planning Appeal Board (1976 2 NZLR 206; Songkal v Warringah Council (2000) 111 LGERA 71; Sydney City Council v Ilenace Pty Ltd (1984) 3 NSWLR 414; Toadolla Corp Pty Ltd v Dumaresq Shire Council (1992) NSWLEC 129; Tong Joo Pty Ltd v Mosman Council (2001) NSWLEC 87; Westport Marina Developments Pty Ltd v Concord Council (2000) 109 LGERA 451; Willoughby Municipal Council v Manchil Pty Ltd (1974) 29 LGRA 303; York Developments Pty Ltd v Liverpool City Council (2000) NSWLEC 174 DATES OF HEARING: 8 March 2001 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/29/2001
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate