NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: Phillis v RobarBoring Contractors Pty Ltd [2005] NSWIRComm 1185
APPLICANT: Mr. J. Phillis PARTIES: RESPONDENT: Robar Boring Contractors Pty Ltd
FILE NUMBER(S): 2342 of 2005
CORAM: Ritchie C
Employee injured at work. Workers Compensation claimed and accepted. Injured worker returned to work for two non consecutive days. Employer sent employee home concerned about safety at work. Employer received medical evidence stating employee never would return to full time work. As a consequence employer terminated employee. Employee made application under s.93 of IR Act. Applicant sought to return to part time position for a three month duration and then revue situation. Respondent argued lack of medical evidence that would allow Commission to reinstate applicant. CATCHWORDS: Volume of work down,respondent already terminated staff as a consequence and failed to replace other staff who had resigned. Applicant had received a payout re workers compensation claim. Commission found that weight of medical evidence showed that applicant had failed to prove fit to return to employment sought. Medical evidence expressed degree of concern if reinjured. Applicant prepared to risk being reinjured. Respondent's responsibility re compliance with OH&S. Would find difficult to comply if applicant reinstated. Application dismissed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate