NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Wherry v Trustees of the Sisters of Charity of Australia [2001] NSWLEC 210 APPLICANT: Wherry PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Trustees of the Sisters of Charity of Australia FILE NUMBER(S) : 30302 of 1999 CORAM: Bignold J KEY ISSUES: Costs :- Respondent wholly successful in resisting Applicant's claims to compensation-Respondent obtaining by concession easement for support in respect of encroachment-Whether usual principle that costs follow the event should apply-Indemnity costs in respect of "Calderbank" letter. LEGISLATION CITED: Encroachment of Buildings Act 1922 Byron Shire Council v Vaughan (No 3) 2001 NSWLEC 102; Droga v Proprietors of Strata Plan 51722 (LEC Unreported 28 November 1997); Hardie v Cuthbert (1988) 65 LGRA 5; CASES CITED: Hofer v Howell (2001) 113 LGERA 391; Kostis v Devitt (1979) BPR 97020; Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534; MGICA (1992) Pty Ltd v Kenny and Good Pty Ltd (No 2) (1996) 70 FCR 236; Morris v Thomas (1991) 73 LGRA 164 DATES OF HEARING: 6 September 2001 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/11/2001
APPLICANT: Mr J M Ireland QC with Mr M J Steele, Barrister SOLICITORS Malcolm Johns and Co LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Mr J E Robson, Barrister SOLICITORS Cutler Hughes and Harris
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate