NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 114 LGERA 61
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Druitts Developments Pty Ltd v Gosford City Council [2001] NSWLEC 96 APPLICANT: Druitts Developments Pty Ltd PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Gosford City Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10075 of 2001 CORAM: Bignold J Development Application :- Determination of preliminary questions - (i) Is development site land that is excluded from application of SEPP No 5? KEY ISSUES: (ii) Does SEPP No 5 apply to development application in its original or amended version? (iii) Does proposal involve more than two storeys LEGISLATION CITED: State Environmental Planning Policy No 5 Dainford Ltd v Smith (1985) 155 CLR 342 at 348; Franklins Limited v Penrith City Council (1999) NSWCA 134; Invergowrie Properties Pty Ltd v Willoughby City Council (1992) 78LGERA 67; CASES CITED: Leichhardt Municipal council v Daniel Callaghan Pty Ltd (1981) 46 LGRA 29; MLC Properties v Camden Council (1997) 96 LGERA 52; Randwick Municipal Council v Janez Constructions Pty Ltd (1976) 35 LGRA 70; Nalor Pty Ltd v Bankstown City Council (1980) 2 NSWLR 630; Schroders Australia Property Management Ltd v Shoalhaven Council (2001) NSWCA 74 DATES OF HEARING: 15/05/01 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/16/2001
APPLICANT: Mr J Webster, Barrister SOLICITORS Taperell Rutledge LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Mr A J J Thompson, Barrister SOLICITORS P J Donnellan & Co
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate