NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: Public Service Association and Professional Officers' Association Amalgamated Union of New South Wales (on behalf of Kylie McKelvie) and Department of Juvenile Justice [2008] NSWIRComm 98
APPLICANT Public Service Association and Professional Officers' Association Amalgamated Union of New South Wales PARTIES: RESPONDENT Department of Juvenile Justice
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC1835; IRC1852; IRC1853 of 2007
CORAM: Sams DP
Industrial dispute - unfair dismissal - victimisation - Youth Officer at juvenile justice centre - decision not to offer any further shifts to employee - employee not told of decision - employee and Union not told of reasons for decision - false reason given to employee, Union and the Commission - Union activities of delegate - allegations of bullying and harassment - Spokeswomens' program - Union matters raised with management - notes and record of meetings - conversation between senior managers about other matters - matters of concern never raised with employee - allegation that Union activities prompted dismissal - breach of freedom of association provisions - reverse onus - substantial and operative cause of dismissal - procedural unfairness - whether casual employee may be dismissed at any time - relevant principles. CATCHWORDS: Held; significant issues for the relationship between Union and respondent - public interest - unfair dismissal ultimate manifestation of victimisation - meaning of victimisation - intent of the provisions - unfair dismissal provisions - meaning of harsh, unreasonable and unjust - procedural fairness principles - dismissal at will and at any time - failure to call relevant witnesses to give evidence - admission that prospective witness would be unreliable - admission of procedural unfairness - unacceptable not to inform employees of decision to dismiss or reasons for decision - gross denial of procedural fairness and natural justice - reliance on Public Sector Employment and Management Act not available - false reason given to employee, Union and the Commission - recommendation that investigation be held as to instructions given to Counsel - effect of dismissal - implication of 'coverup' - failure to call relevant persons to give evidence - no note or written record of decision - decision conveyed orally to senior management - no confidence in evidence of decision maker - employee's evidence preferred - no evidence of inappropriate conduct - employee warned about Union activities - finding of unfair dismissal - finding of victimisation - no issue of the impracticality of reinstatement - recommendations - reinstatement ordered - orders for lost remuneration and continuity - dispute discontinued.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate