NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Chisholm v Pittwater Council and Anor [2000] NSWLEC 210 APPLICANT: Samuel Chisholm
PARTIES : FIRST RESPONDENT: Pittwater Council
SECOND RESPONDENT: Willeroon Pty Ltd FILE NUMBER(S) : 40046 of 2000 CORAM: Talbot J KEY ISSUES: Interlocutory Relief :- pending appeal to Court of Appeal Costs :- two respondents separately represented LEGISLATION CITED: Castlemaine Tooheys Limited and Ors v State of South Australia (1986) 161 CLR 148; Hamill v Byron Shire Council (1998) 98 LGERA 400; CASES CITED: Hoyts Cinemas Limited v Shellharbour City Council (2000) 108 LGERA 103; Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72; Packham v Minister for the Environment and Anor (1993) 80 LGERA 205; Scott and Ors v Wollongong City Council and Anor (1992) 75 LGERA 112 DATES OF HEARING: 13/09/2000 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/28/2000
APPLICANT: Mr N A Hemmings QC (Solicitor) SOLICITORS: Allen Allen & Hemsley
FIRST RESPONDENT: Mr R P Lancaster (Barrister) LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: SOLICITORS: Mallesons Stephen Jaques
SECOND RESPONDENT: Mr W P O'Rourke (Solicitor) SOLICITORS: Deacons Graham & James
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate