NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: Elka Simjanovska and Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales (No 1) [2006] NSWIRComm 405
APPLICANT Elka Simjanovska PARTIES: RESPONDENT Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales
FILE NUMBER(S): 4554 of 2005; 2762; 3138 of 2006
CORAM: Sams DP
CATCHWORDS: Notice of motion - extension of timetable for filing of evidence - adjournment of hearing dates - amended notice of motion - order to produce documents - appeal of procedural rulings - stay of proceedings refused - notice of motion in identical terms as stay order sought - abuse of process - issue already determined - sufficient material available for case to be prepared and listed for hearing - no basis for further order to produce documents - further conciliation - notice of motion refused.
LEGISLATION CITED: Freedom of Information Act 1989 Industrial Relations Act 1996 s 188, s 189, s 210 and s 213
HEARING DATES: 15/12/2006 EXTEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 12/15/2006
APPLICANT Elka Simjanovska (unrepresented) LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Ms J Nand Spark Helmore Lawyers
JUDGMENT:
- 6 - INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES
CORAM: SAMS DP 15 December 2006
Matter No IRC 4554 of 2005 and 2762, 3138 of 2006 Elka Simjanovska and Roads and Traffic Authority
Application by Elka Simjanovska for relief from victimisation pursuant to section 213 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate