NSW Caselaw
Industrial Court of New South Wales
CITATION: Michael Dalzell v Andrew James Ferguson [2009] NSWIRComm 81
APPELLANT: Michael Dalzell PARTIES: RESPONDENT: Andrew James Ferguson
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 1328 of 2008
CORAM: Walton J Vice-President; Kavanagh J; Haylen J; Backman J
Statutory interpretation - occupational health and safety - appeal from finding of guilt by Chief Industrial Magistrate following a summary defended hearing - breach of s 136(1)(a) Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 - preliminary question as to whether s 136(1)(a) an offence of strict liability - held: s 136(1)(a) an offence of strict liability.
CATCHWORDS: Appeal - occupational health and safety - appeal from finding of guilt by CIM following a summary defended hearing - breach of s 136(1)(a) 2000 Act - allegation that two union officials, properly authorised under the 2000 Act and attending the appellant's premises in the exercise of official functions, were obstructed - whether a corporation may be found guilty of an offence of strict liability - whether error in findings that appellant acted under an honest and reasonable mistake of fact - whether findings made were against the weight of evidence, or not open on the evidence, or not established by the respondent - whether charge objectionable for duplicity - appeal in respect of s 136(1)(a) offence dismissed - costs.
Occupational health and safety - appeal - appeal from finding of guilt by CIM following a summary defended hearing - breach of s 136(1)(a) 2000 Act - allegation that two union officials, properly authorised under the 2000 Act and attending the appellant's premises in the exercise of official functions, were obstructed - whether a corporation may be found guilty of an offence of strict liability - whether error in findings that appellant acted under an honest and reasonable mistake of fact - whether findings made were against the weight of evidence, or not open on the evidence, or not established by the respondent - whether charge objectionable for duplicity - appeal in respect of s 136(1)(a) offence dismissed - costs.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate