NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales CITATION: Michael Bald & Associates -v- Byron Council [1999] NSWLEC 78
PARTIES APPLICANT: Michael Bald & Associates
RESPONDENT: Byron Council
NUMBER: 10597 of 1998
CORAM: Lloyd J
KEY ISSUES: :- whether the Court on an appeal under the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act can exercise power under alternative legislation.
LEGISLATION CITED: whether the Court on an appeal under the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act can exercise power under alternative legislation.
DATES OF HEARING: 03/26/1999
DATE OF JUDGMENT DELIVERY: 04/08/1999
APPLICANT: J J Webster Solicitors: Harris Fiford Crane LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: P C Tomasetti Solicitors: Wilshire Webb
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND Matter No: 10597/98 ENVIRONMENT COURT Coram: Lloyd J OF NEW SOUTH WALES Decision date:08/04/99
MICHAEL BALD & ASSOCIATES Applicant
v
BYRON SHIRE COUNCIL Respondent
JUDGMENT
HIS HONOUR:
1. This is the determination of questions of law pursuant to the Land & Environment Court Act 1979, s 36(5), which arose in proceedings being heard by a Commissioner. The Commissioner was hearing an appeal under the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979, s 97, against the refusal of a development application for the erection of a mixed commercial and residential building to contain four residential units, nine shops and associated car parking.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate