NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Remath Investments (No. 6) Pty Ltd v Botany Bay City Council [2000] NSWLEC 137 APPLICANT: Remath Investments (No. 6) Pty Ltd PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Botany Bay City Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10465 of 1997 CORAM: Talbot J KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- whether made for purpose of transitional regulation when accompanied by EIS found to be defective Practice & Procedure :- application to re-open after remitted by Court of Appeal for redetermination Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 77 LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 1994 cl 50, cl 51, cl 52, Sch 2 Environmental Planning and Assessment (Savings and Transitional) Regulation 1998 cl 11 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 39(3) Amacon Pty Ltd v Concord Municipal Council (Hemmings J, NSWLEC, 2 December 1987, unreported); CASES CITED: Coulton and Ors v Holcombe and Ors (1986) 162 CLR 1; Helman v Byron Shire Council and Anor (1995) 87 LGERA 349 DATES OF HEARING: 22/06/2000, 23/06/2000 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/28/2000
APPLICANT: Mr C W McEwen (Barrister) SOLICITORS: Aitken McLachlan & Thorpe LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Mr T S Hale SC SOLICITORS: Houston Dearn O'Connor
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate