NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: Griffith City Council v USU (on behalf of O'Hara) [2006] NSWIRComm 233
APPELLANT: Griffith City Council PARTIES: RESPONDENT: New South Wales Local Government, Clerical, Administrative, Energy, Airlines & Utilities Union (USU) (on behalf of Shane O'Hara)
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 2655 of 2006
CORAM: Wright J President
CATCHWORDS: Stay - Appeal - Appeal against order of reinstatement - Unfair dismissal proceedings - Principles not in issue - Whether stay should be ordered - Terms upon which stay granted - Employee's usual pay - Matters which may be raised on appeal - Stay granted on terms.
LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996 s84
CASES CITED: New South Wales Local Government, Clerical, Administrative, Energy, Airlines & Utilities Union (on behalf of Shane Gregory O'Hara) and Griffith City Council [2006] NSWIRComm 1102 Plummer v Stannard Bros Launch Service Pty Limited (2005) 145 IR 111
HEARING DATES: 11/07/2006 EXTEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 07/11/2006
APPELLANT: Mr A Searle of counsel Mr Darren Gardner LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Maddocks Lawyers
RESPONDENT: Mr G Golledge New South Wales Local Government, Clerical, Administrative, Energy, Airlines & Utilities Union
JUDGMENT:
INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES
CORAM: WRIGHT J, President
Tuesday 11 July 2006
Matter No IRC 2655 of 2006
GRIFFITH CITY COUNCIL AND NEW SOUTH WALES LOCAL GOVERNMENT, CLERICAL, ADMINISTRATIVE, ENERGY, AIRLINES & UTILITIES UNION (ON BEHALF OF SHANE O'HARA)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate