NSW Caselaw
Industrial Court of New South Wales
CITATION: Stuart Frumar and others v Leo Faibicher (No 2) [2007] NSWIRComm 161
FIRST APPELLANT Stuart Frumar
SECOND APPELLANT Jasso Pty Limited PARTIES: THIRD APPELLANT Stuart Frumar as trustee for the SS Frumar Family Trust
RESPONDENT Leo Faibicher
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 3706 of 2006
CORAM: Boland J
Appeal - Leave to appeal - Stay - Appellant a self represented litigant - Claim by appellant that appeal would be rendered nugatory by his impecuniosity if stay not granted - No evidence adduced as to appellant's financial circumstances - Principles applicable to granting a stay - Stay granted on terms CATCHWORDS: Stay - Appeal - Leave to appeal - Appellant a self represented litigant - Claim by appellant that appeal would be rendered nugatory by his impecuniosity if stay not granted - No evidence adduced as to appellant's financial circumstances - Principles applicable to granting a stay - Stay granted on terms
LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act s 190A
Faibicher v Frumar and Others [2006] NSWIRComm 327 CASES CITED: Stuart Frumar and others v Leo Faibicher [2007] NSWIRComm 22 Transport Industry - Waste Collection and Recycling (State) Award, Re (2000) 102 IR 19
HEARING DATES: 6 June 2007
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 27 June 2007
APPELLANT Mr S Frumar in person
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr R Moore of counsel Solicitor: Mr S Lynch Sommerville & Co
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate