NSW Caselaw
Industrial Court of New South Wales
CITATION: Murton v TD Preece and Co. Pty Ltd (No 2) [2007] NSWIRComm 67 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
Applicant: Rick Murton PARTIES: Respondent: TD Preece and Co. Pty Ltd
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 6239 of 2002
CORAM: Backman J
CATCHWORDS: Unfair contract - s 106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 - application for costs by applicant under rule 216(4) of the IRC Rules - judgment order includes order that interest should be payable on principal sum - issue as to relevant period during which interest to be considered - application of rule 216(8) - applicant's application dismissed.
Industrial Relations Act 1996 LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Commission Rules 1996 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005
CASES CITED: Bourke Air Charter v Easton (2001) 109 IR 443 Murton v TD Preece and Co. Pty Ltd [2006] NSWIRComm 367
HEARING DATES: 12/12/06
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 28 March 2007
Applicant: Mr D O'Sullivan Solicitors: Turner Freeman LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Respondent: Mr T Dixon of counsel Solicitors: Jones King Lawyers
JUDGMENT:
- 3 - INDUSTRIAL COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
CORAM: Backman J
Wednesday, 28 March 2007
Matter No IRC 6239 of 2002
RICK MURTON v T D PREECE AND CO. PTY LTD
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate