NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 113 LGERA 335
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Wykanak v Rockdale City Council and Anor. [2001] NSWLEC 65 APPLICANT: Wykanak PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Rockdale City Council & Anor.
FILE NUMBER(S) : 40158 of 2000 CORAM: Bignold J KEY ISSUES: Injunctions and Declarations :- alleged breach of the LG Act - closing to public part of Meeting of Council - whether a justified decision. LEGISLATION CITED: Local Government Act 1993, s 10A, s 10D, s 674, s 676 · Port Stephens Council v Fidler (1997) 94 LGERA 298 at 303; · R v Barnet London Borough Council: Ex parte Shah (1983) 2 AC 309; · Perez v Leslie (1973) 1 NSWLR 195· North Sydney Council v Lycenko & Associates Pty Ltd (1988) 67 LGRA 247; CASES CITED: · Tasker v Fullwood (1978) 1 NSWLR 20· Leichhardt Municipal Council v Minister for Planning (1992) 78 LGERA 306; · Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355.; · Minister for Urban Affairs v Rosemount Estates Pty Ltd (1996) 91LGERA 31; · Johns v Australian Securities Commission (1993) 178 CLR 408 at 426; · Bryant v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1996) 90 LGERA 126 at 134. DATES OF HEARING: 5 April 2001 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/12/2001
APPLICANT: Mr Wykanak in person SOLICITORS N/A LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Ms J Hewitt, Solicitor SOLICITORS Abbott Tout
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate