NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Multistar Pty Limited v The Minister for Urban Affairs & Planning & Anor [No. 2] [2000] NSWLEC 242 APPLICANT: Multistar Pty Limited ACN 072 013 275
PARTIES : FIRST RESPONDENT: The Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning
SECOND RESPONDENT: Sydney City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 40184 of 1999 CORAM: Lloyd J Estoppel :- issue estoppel (Anshun estoppel) - a point assumed or admitted and which formed the groundwork of or was fundamental to a previous decision though not directly the point in issue - same point cannot be raised or questioned in later proceedings - applicant's claim fails in limine
KEY ISSUES: Environmental Planning Instruments:- whether a development control plan can be given the force of a statutory rule - compliance with a development control plan can be an absolute requirement rather than a discretionary requirement
Judicial Review:- environmental planning instruments - validity of clause in a local environmental plan - whether in derogation of incorporated provisions - whether clause for that reason void - procedural fairness - delegation by council - agency Central Sydney Local Environmental Plan 1996 (Amendment No. 9) - Public Car Parking Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 23, s 34, s 62, s 65, s 66, s 67, s 68, s 69, s 70, s 72, s 106, s 107, s 108, s 109, s 117 and s 119 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 1994 Pt 5, cl 16 LEGISLATION CITED: Fair Trading Act 1987 Inflamable Liquid Act 1915 Local Government Act 1993 s 22 and s 377(1) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Big Country Developments v Penrith City Council (1998) 98 LGERA 194; Blair v Curran (1939) 62 CLR 464; Brewer v Brewer (1953) 88 CLR 1; Cachia v Isaacs (1985) 3 NSWLR 366; Carden v Willoughby Municipal Council (1985) 56 LGERA 366; Dainford Limited v Smith (1985) 155 CLR 342; Holster v Director-General of National Parks and Wildlife [1999] NSWLEC 102, unreported; Hoysted v The Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1925) 37 CLR 290; CASES CITED: Kartinyeri v The Commonwealth (1998) 195 CLR 337; McRae v Coulton (1986) 7 NSWLR 644; Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Limited (1996) 162 CLR 24; Moore v Penrith City Council, Talbot J, NSWLEC, 20 July 1993, unreported; Multistar Pty Limited v Sydney City Council [1999] NSWLEC 205, unreported; Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Limited (1981) 147 CLR 589; Re Wakim; Ex-parte McNally (1999) 198 CLR 511; Rosemount Estates Pty Limited v The Minister (1996) 90 LGERA 1; Vanmeld Pty Limited v Fairfield City Council (1999) 46 NSWLR 78, 101 LGERA 297; Wright v T.I.L. Services Pty Limited [1956] 56 SR (NSW) 413 DATES OF HEARING: 09/10/2000; 10/10/2000; 11/10/2000 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/04/2000
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate