NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: Daniel Skelly and Commissioner of Police (No 2) [2009] NSWIRComm 119
APPLICANT (respondent to motion) Police Association of New South Wales (on behalf of Daniel Skelly) PARTIES: RESPONDENT (applicant on motion) Commissioner of Police
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 89 of 2009
CORAM: Sams DP
NOTICE OF MOTION - s 173 order under the Police Act 1990 - jurisdictional challenge - orders sought dismissing substantive application - power to dismiss substantive application should be carefully exercised - whether proposed transfer of police sergeant a non disciplinary transfer - reviewable or non reviewable action - finding of misconduct - previous conduct issues - Interim Management Plan - investigation - recommendation of reviewable action and s 181D dismissal during investigation - decision maker determines non disciplinary transfer - Police Force policies - previous legislative provisions - previous Police Regulations - Wood Royal Commission - remedial versus punitive purpose.
CATCHWORDS: STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION - principles of statutory construction - legislative scheme - meaning of 'non disciplinary transfer' - ordinary grammatical meaning of words - words must have meaning and be given effect to - avoidance of absurd or irrational result - distinction between non disciplinary and disciplinary transfer - principle of 'presumption of regularity' - whether order made for ulterior purpose or in bad faith - cogent and persuasive evidence required.
Held; no cogent or persuasive evidence of ulterior purpose or bad faith - transfer arising from disciplinary process must be a disciplinary transfer - non disciplinary transfer may arise in interim management action - absurd and irrational result - no conflict with other statutory provisions - ordinary commonsense meaning of words - definition of 'punitive' - transfer must have 'punitive' effect - definition of 'non disciplinary transfer' rejected - proposed transfer is a disciplinary transfer - transfer is 'reviewable action' - substantive application competently before Commission - Commission has jurisdiction to determine application - notice of motion dismissed - further proceedings to be programmed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate