NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: Uremovic -v- Staff Innovations [2006] NSWIRComm 1039
APPLICANT PARTIES: Antony Uremovic RESPONDENT Staff Innovations Pty Ltd
FILE NUMBER(S): 1950 of 2005
CORAM: Cambridge C
CATCHWORDS: Unfair dismissal - termination of employment - vicarious employment - alleged implied term to permit insistance on exclusive placement with a particular client of the employer - particular circumstances of vicarious employment analysed - no implied term established in this instance - applicant not a dismissed employee - claim dismissed.
LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996 [NSW]
HEARING DATES: 29/11/2005
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/01/2006
APPLICANT Mr J Clements, Australian Workers Union
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr M Cleary, barrister Solicitors for Respondent Moray & Agnew
DECISION: - 1 - INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES
COMMISSIONER CAMBRIDGE
1 March 2006
Matter No IRC 1950 of 2005
Antony Uremovic -v- Staff Innovations
Application by The Australian Workers' Union, New South Wales on behalf of its member Antony Uremovic re unfair dismissal pursuant to section 84 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996.
DECISION
[2006] NSWIRComm1039
1 This matter involves a claim for unfair dismissal taken pursuant to section 84 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 [NSW], (the Act). The application was made by the Australian Workers' Union (the AWU), on behalf of Antony Uremovic (the applicant). The respondent employer has been identified as Staff Innovations Pty Ltd (the employer). 2 The claim was the subject of unsuccessful conciliation proceedings held on 16 June and 8 July 2005. Following the unsuccessful attempted conciliation the matter proceeded to Hearing on 29 November 2005.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate