NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 109 LGERA 398
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Westpoint Corp. Pty Ltd v Rockdale City Council [2000] NSWLEC 148 APPLICANT: Westpoint Corp. Pty Ltd PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Rockdale City Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10362 of 2000 CORAM: Bignold J KEY ISSUES: Question of Law :- whether proposed "mixed use development" is prohibited by LEP. LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 97 CASES CITED: Egan v Hawkesbury City Council (1993) 79LGERA 321; Friends of Pryor Park Inc v Ryde Council (unreported 25 September 1995 Bignold J)) DATES OF HEARING: 08/06/00 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/12/2000
APPLICANT: Mr P McClellan QC SOLICITORS] Coudert Bros LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Mr D Officer QC with Mr J Johnson, Barrister SOLICITORS Abbott Tout
JUDGMENT: IN THE LAND AND Matter No . 10362 of 2000 ENVIRONMENT COURT OF Coram : Bignold J. NEW SOUTH WALES 14 July 2000
WESTPOINT CORPORATION PTY LTD
Applicant
v
ROCKDALE CITY COUNCIL
Respondent
JUDGMENT
Bignold J:
A. INTRODUCTION
1. The Council has raised a question of law for preliminary determination in pending Class 1 proceedings involving an appeal pursuant to Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 97 against the Council's deemed refusal of the Applicant's development application to carry out a major development on land known as lot 8 Deposited Plan 231950 and lot 2 Deposited Plan 247112 situate at 383 West Botany Street, Rockdale (the appeal site).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate