NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Byron Shire Council v The Rising Damp Corporation Pty Limited [2001] NSWLEC 260 PROSECUTOR Byron Shire Council PARTIES : DEFENDANT The Rising Damp Corporation Pty Limited FILE NUMBER(S) : 50086 of 2000 CORAM: Talbot J KEY ISSUES: Prosecution :- company carrying out development - whether relevant knowledge of the development proved - circumstantial evidence - accessorial liability - vicarious liability Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 4, s 76A, s 76A(1), s 125, s 125(1) LEGISLATION CITED: Evidence Act 1995 s 97 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 55 Byron Shire Local Environmental Plan 1988 Aussie Traveller Pty Ltd v Marklea Pty Ltd [1998] 1 Qd R 1; Burrell v Jacenko (1998) 99 LGERA 173 ; Chamberlain and Another [No. 2] v The Queen (1983 - 1984) 153 CLR 521; Cooper v Coffs Harbour City Council (1997) 97 LGERA 125 ; Empress Car Co (Abertillery) Ltd v National Rivers Authority [1998] 1 All ER 481; Environmental Protection Authority v ADI Limited (Talbot J, NSWLEC, 22 October 1998, unreported); Environmental Protection Authority v ADI Ltd [1999] NSWLEC 14, unreported; Giorgianni v The Queen (1985) 156 CLR 473 ; Gosford City Council v Popran Creek Pty Ltd and Polo (1995) 89 LGERA 208; Histollo Pty Ltd v Director-General of National Parks and Wildlife Service (1988) 103 LGERA 355; Holroyd City Council v Murdoch (1994) 82 LGERA 197;; Bahri Kural v The Queen (1987) 162 CLR 502 ; Macquarie University v Ryde Municipal Council [1977] 1 NSWLR 304; Murdoch v Holroyd City Council (Priestley JA, Sheller JA, Cohen AJA, NSWCA, 20 November 1996, unreported).; Pereira v Director of Public Prosecutions (1988) 82 ALR 217 ; CASES CITED: Performing Right Society Limited v Ciryl Theatrical Syndicate Limited (1924) 1 KB 1; R v Randall Barrie Von Snarski [2001] QCA 71, unreported; Rao v Canterbury City Council (2000) 112 LGERA 360; Regina v Shorrock (1994) QB 279 ; Ryde Municipal Council v Macquarie University (1978) 139 CLR 633 ; Saad (1987) 29 A Crim R 20 ; Sedleigh-Denfield v O'Callaghan and Others (1940) AC 880; Shepherd v The Queen (1990) 170 CLR 573; South Sydney City Council v Paul Dainty Corporation Pty Ltd and the Sydney Cricket and Sports Ground Trust (1992) 75 LGRA 202; South Sydney City Council v Spanos Enterprises Pty Ltd and Ors (Pearlman J, NSWLEC, 8 July 1998, unreported); Tesco Supermarkets Ltd v Nattrass (1972) AC 153; The Corporation of the City of Adelaide v The Australasian Performing Right Association Limited (1928) 40 CLR 481 ; The Council of the City of South Sydney v Kurtonal, and Ors (Bignold J, NSWLEC, 12 February 1997, unreported); Universal Telecasters (Qld) Ltd v Guthrie (1977) 18 ALR 531 ; Von Lieven v Stewart; Kemish v Godfrey and Another (1990) 21 NSWLR 52 ; Wright and Romeyko v Corporation of City of West Torrens (1996) 91 LGERA 197 DATES OF HEARING: 24/09/2001, 25/09/2001, 26/09/2001, 25/10/2001, 26/10/2001, 31/10/2001 (final written submissions) DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/30/2001
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate