NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 113 LGERA 301
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Perry Properties Pty Ltd v Ashfield Council (No 2) [2001] NSWLEC 62 APPLICANT: Perry Properties Pty Ltd PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Ashfield Council (No 2) FILE NUMBER(S) : 10513 of 1999 CORAM: Bignold J KEY ISSUES: Section 56A Appeal :- Remitted proceedings requiring re-determination of development appeal - social impact of proposed brothel development - constructive failure to consider LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 56A, s 38(4) Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 79C Broad v Brisbane City Council (1986) 59 LGRA 296; Graham Richter and Associates Pty Ltd v Campbelltown City Council (unreported 10 July 2000); Kulin Holdings Pty Ltd v Penrith City Council (1999) 103 LGERA 402; CASES CITED: Leichhardt Municipal Council v Daniel Callaghan Pty Ltd (1982) 56 LGRA; Liu v Fairfield Council (1996) NSWLEC 272 ; Minister Administering the Heritage Act 1977 v Haddad (unreported 4 February 1991); Novak v Woodville City Council (1990) 70 LGERA 233; Venus Enterprises v Parramatta City Council (1981) 43 LGERA 67 DATES OF HEARING: 23/03/01 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/04/2001
APPLICANT: Mr S Austin QC SOLICITORS Utter Webster and Evans LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Mr B McClintock SC with Mr S Flanigan SOLICITORS Deacons Graham and James
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate