NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: Barrell v. Geekie (No.2) [2006] NSWIRComm 1147
APPLICANT Anna Barrell PARTIES: RESPONDENT Andrew Geekie and Janet Geekie, trading as Janet Manly Clinical Skin Care
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 1116 of 2006
CORAM: Connor C
CATCHWORDS: termination of employment - closure of business - bankrupt employer - ex parte proceedings - difficulty in recovering entitlements or orders for monetary compensation - identity of employer
LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996
Busways v. Johnson (1994) 55 IR 255 CASES CITED: Grimshaw v. Dunbar (1953) 1 All ER 350 Healy v. Johnston - unreported
HEARING DATES: 05/10/2006
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/05/2006
EXTEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 10/05/2006
APPLICANT no appearance LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT no appearance
DECISION: INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES
CORAM: CONNOR C
Thursday, 5 October, 2006
Matter No IRC 1116 of 2006
Anna Barrell and Andrew and Janet Geekie, trading as Janet Manly Clinical Skin Care
Application under S.84 of the Industrial Relations Act, 1996
SUPPLEMENTARY DECISION
[2006] NSWIRComm 1147
1 On Wednesday, 26 July, 2006 I handed down my decision on an application by Mrs Anna Barrell under Part 6, Unfair Dismissals, of Chapter 2, Employment [Ss.83 to 90] of the 1996 Industrial Relations Act. Mrs Barrell had been employed by Mr Andrew Geekie and his wife, Janet Geekie, in a skincare clinic for nine years until the business closed down. The clinic apparently traded under a range of titles - Janet Beauty Salon, Janet Manley Aesthetic Centre, Janet Manley Looking Good, Janet Manley Clinical Skin Care, Janet Skincare and Beauty and Janet Manley Clinical Skincare. Mrs Barrell's services were terminated on Saturday, 11 February, 2006.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate