NSW Caselaw
Industrial Court of New South Wales
CITATION: Neeson v Amora Company Limited and ors (No 2) [2007] NSWIRComm 139
APPLICANT: Linda Iris Neeson
FIRST RESPONDENT: Amora Company Limited
PARTIES: SECOND RESPONDENT: Amora Group Pty Limited (ACN 112 177 885)
THIRD RESPONDENT: Dr Tanapun Siriphatrawan
FOURTH RESPONDENT: Philip Johnson
FILE NUMBER(S): 3417 of 2005
CORAM: Marks J
CATCHWORDS: Unfair contract s106 proceedings - interlocutory strike out application - issue of territorial nexus between contracts and NSW - application to be considered at appropriate stage of proceedings - requirement of all necessary evidentiary material - final determination stood over to allow further processes sought by applicant.
LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996 s106
Linda Neeson v Amora Company Limited and ors (2007) NSWIRComm 25 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125 CASES CITED: Agar v Hyde (2000) 201 CLR 552 Batistatos v Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales [2006] HCA 27 Nagle v Tilburg (1993) 51 IR 8 Yim and Kim v Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales and Choi [2007] NSWCA 77
HEARING DATES: 9 & 12 March, 14 May 2007
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 13 June 2007
APPLICANT: Mr J Murphy of counsel SOLICITOR: Mr C McArdle McArdle Legal LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: SECOND TO FOURTH RESPONDENTS: Mr S Prince of counsel SOLICITORS Ms A Harvey Coleman & Greig
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate