NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales CITATION: Perry v Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales [1999] NSWLEC 109
PARTIES APPLICANT Raymond Thomas Perry
RESPONDENT Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales
NUMBER: 30009 of 1996
CORAM: Bignold J
KEY ISSUES: :- Compulsory acquisition for purposes of "Roads Act 1993" - whether Applicant can claim compensation on the "Raja" principle for the special potentiality of the land where the acquiring authority is only possible purchaser - Whether s56(1)(a) of the Just Terms Act (Pointe Gourde principle) abrogates Raja principle.
LEGISLATION CITED: Compulsory acquisition for purposes of "Roads Act 1993" - whether Applicant can claim compensation on the "Raja" principle for the special potentiality of the land where the acquiring authority is only possible purchaser - Whether s56(1)(a) of the Just Terms Act (Pointe Gourde principle) abrogates Raja principle.
DATES OF HEARING: 04/15/1998; 04/16/1998; 04/17/1998; 04/21/1998; 04/22/1998; 04/23/1998; 04/24/1998; 04/29/1998; 04/30/1998; 05/01/1998; 05/04/1998; 05/05/1998; 07/27/1998; 07/28/1998; 07/30/1998; 08/07/1998; 08/21/1998; 09/28/1998; 10/07/1998; 10/16/1998; 12/23/1998; 01/13/1999; 02/04/1999
DATE OF JUDGMENT DELIVERY: 05/07/1999
APPLICANT Mr J Webster, Barrister with Ms M Peatman, Solicitor
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate