NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 112 LGERA 438
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Starray Pty Ltd v The Council of the City of Sydney [2001] NSWLEC 38 APPLICANT: Starray Pty Ltd PARTIES : RESPONDENT: The Council of the City of Sydney FILE NUMBER(S) : 10605 of 2000 CORAM: Bignold J KEY ISSUES: Practice & Procedure :- Motion to reopen concluded development appeal on basis of subsequent decision of Court. LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Rules 1996, Part 15, r 9(b) Bailey v Marinoff (1971) 125 CLR 529; Baldry v Jackson (1976) 2 NSWLR 415 at 419; DJL v Central Authority (2000) 74 ALJR 706; CASES CITED: MacDonald v Mosman Municipal Council (No 2) (2000) 107 LGERA 211; Memel Holdings Pty Ltd v Pittwater Council (2000) NSWLEC 227; Multistar Pty Ltd v The Minister of Urban Affairs and Planning and Anor (No 2) (2000) NSWLEC 242; Tenstat Chullora No 2 Trust v Valuer General (2000) 110 LGERA 227 DATES OF HEARING: 22 February 2001 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/02/2001
APPLICANT: Mr P Lalich, Solicitor SOLICITORS Allen Allen and Hemsley LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Mr S Rares SC with Mr F Assaf, Barrister SOLICITORS Price Waterhouse Coopers Legal
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND Matter No. 10605 of 2000 ENVIRONMENT COURT OF Coram: Bignold J. NEW SOUTH WALES 2 March 2001
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate