NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 120 LGERA 1
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Blaxland Park Pty Limited v Blue Mountains City Council [2001] NSWLEC 156 APPLICANT: Blaxland Park Pty Limited PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Blue Mountains City Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 11115 of 2000 CORAM: Talbot J KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- original plan for conventional subdivision - substitute subdivision plan for purpose of cluster housing development and community title - whether substitute plan can be regarded as an amendment - question of whether leave should be granted to rely on amended plans. LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 39(2) Blue Mountains Local Environmental Plan 1991 CASES CITED: DATES OF HEARING: 12/07/01 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/23/2001
APPLICANT: Mr C C Gough (Solicitor) SOLICITORS: Storey & Gough LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Mr J E Robson (Barrister) SOLICITORS: McPhee Kelshaw
JUDGMENT: IN THE LAND AND Matter No. 11115 of 2000 ENVIRONMENT COURT Coram: Talbot J OF NEW SOUTH WALES Decision Date: 23 July 2001
Blaxland Park Pty Limited Applicant v Blue Mountains City Council Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
1. On or about 28 April 2000, Blaxland Park Pty Limited (the applicant) lodged a development application with the respondent council seeking approval for a 37 lot residential subdivision with two public reserve lots in relation to land in Winnicoopa Road, Blaxland.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate