NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: Montes v. Mixing Pot Restaurant [2008] NSWIRComm 1045
APPLICANT Emmanuel Montes PARTIES: RESPONDENT Mixing Pot Restaurant
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 358 of 2008
CORAM: Connor C
CATCHWORDS: termination of employment - restaurant industry - failure to prosecute claim - involvement with unresolved civil proceedings alleged - questions of jurisdiction - matter dismissed for want of prosecution - position of applicant reserved for subsequent arbitration
LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996 Federal Workplace Relations Amendment (Work Choices) Act 2005
CASES CITED: State of New South Wales v. Commonwealth of Australia (2006) 156 IR 1
HEARING DATES: 28/05/2008
EXTEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 28 May 2008
APPLICANT no appearance
RESPONDENT LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Pranav Bhatt Restaurant and Catering Industry Association of New South Wales
DECISION: INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES
CORAM: CONNOR C
Wednesday, 28 May, 2008
Matter No IRC 358 of 2008
Emmanuel Montes and the Mixing Pot Restaurant
Application under S.84 of the Industrial Relations Act, 1996
DECISION
[2008] NSWIRComm 1045
1 Mr Emmanuel Montes was employed as a waiter at the Mixing Pot Restaurant. His services were terminated on Saturday, 1 March, 2008 after five months of employment and he subsequently lodged an application under Part 6, Unfair Dismissals, of Chapter 2, Employment [Ss.83 to 90] of the 1996 Industrial Relations Act. In his Part 6 application he has claimed that the termination of his services was unfair and he has sought monetary compensation over it. The matter was allocated to me by Registry staff and set down by them for a conciliation/directions hearing on Wednesday, 9 April, 2008 and mentions on Thursday, 24 April, 2008 (which was vacated at the request of Mr Montes) and Wednesday, 7 May, 2008 (which was also vacated at the request of Mr Montes).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate